Blogs

Judgments in the Degussa and Akzo cases: erosion of the European leniency programme?

The appeals filed by Degussa and Akzo against the (proposed) publication of an amended public version of a fine order of the European Commission were recently disallowed by the General Court. This new order was to state the entire content of the order, including information provided with regard to the leniency application. It remains to be seen what implications these judgments will have on the tension between transparency on the one hand and an effective leniency programme on the other hand. Read more >

E-commerce and ‘best price’: the outside scrutiny factor

Unlike numerous other European Member States, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers & Markets (Autoriteit Consument & Markt; “ACM’’) has stayed aloof from investigations into vertical restraints. In the past years it has not imposed any fines in either online or offline cases involving resale price maintenance. In other Member States, such as Germany and the United Kingdom, these type of restraints have in fact been scrutinized. The European Commission is now also stepping in. Read more >

Enforcing ban on cartels: more carrot, but also more stick?

Competition authorities have two instruments in investigating and penalizing cartels: the stick of high fines and the carrot of leniency for parties that come forward and report their involvement in a cartel. With regard to the carrot, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (Autoriteit Consument en Markt; “ACM”) made significant progress last year. Unlike in the past, immunity will be possible in future after ACM has already launched an investigation into the cartel. Read more >

Dutch courts have no need for Antitrust Damages Directive

This last year Dutch courts have clarified the rules on what is known as the “passing on” defence. The European Commission had previously stated that it considered such a defence legitimate, but the rulings of Dutch courts in such cases were not yet unequivocal. They were able to state their opinion on this point again this last year. Read more >

ACM’s decision in the AstraZeneca case: from cartel paradise to monopoly paradise?

ACM recently announced that after four years it has closed its investigation into possible abuse of a dominant position by AstraZeneca. ACM ultimately took the position that AstraZeneca did not have a dominant position and for that reason cannot have breached the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position. Read more >

What will the European Commission and the ACM do about e-commerce and e-tailing?

The world is increasingly online – and the same applies to the distribution of products. The European Commission has stated that it attaches great importance to internet distribution (also known as “e‑tailing”). National competition authorities are increasingly focusing on resale price maintenance, usually combined with online distribution. That is not yet the case in the Netherlands. Read more >

Court of Justice tightens conditions for applying cartel prohibition

The Court of Justice recently made it clear that an infringement of the cartel prohibition is a fact if it is apparent that an agreement between undertakings sufficiently distorts competition. It remains to be seen whether the judgment will have major consequences in practice.  Read more >

Newsletter

Please register here for our newsletter.